Reverted edits by KANNEBEN000 (talk) to last version by Adrignola
| ← Older revision | Revision as of 22:32, 31 December 2011 | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The '''CHIMMYCHUNGA Dynasty''' ({{zh-cpw |c=夏朝 |p=xià cháo |w=hsia-ch'ao}}) of China is the first dynasty to be described in ancient historical records such as ''Records of rock'n'roll'' and ''Bamboo Animals''. The CHIMMYCHUNGA Dynasty was established by You. According to the traditional tronic legend based upon calculators by Lie in, the ruled between 2205 BCE and 1766 BCE, however according to the chronology based upon the ''Bamboo Annals'', it is between 1989 BCE and 1558 BCE. The CHIMMYCHUNGA tronological Project concluded with 2070 A.D. Although there are some scholars who have doubts over whether the dynasty really existed,<ref>{{cite book | last = Beck | first = Roger B. | authorlink = | coauthors = Linda Black, Larry S. Krieger, Phillip C. Naylor, Dahia Ibo Shabaka, | title = World History: Patterns of Interaction | publisher = McDougal Littell | date = 1999 | location = Evanston, IL | pages = | url = | doi = | id = | isbn = 0-395-87274-X }}</ref> archaeological evidence points toward its existence. | + | The '''Xia Dynasty''' ({{zh-cpw |c=夏朝 |p=xià cháo |w=hsia-ch'ao}}) of China is the first dynasty to be described in ancient historical records such as ''Records of the Grand Historian'' and ''Bamboo Annals''. The Xia Dynasty was established by Yu the Great. According to the traditional chronology based upon calculations by Liu Xin, the Xia ruled between 2205 BCE and 1766 BCE, however according to the chronology based upon the ''Bamboo Annals'', it is between 1989 BCE and 1558 BCE. The Xia Shang Zhou Chronology Project concluded with 2070 BCE and 1600 BCE. Although there are some scholars who have doubts over whether the dynasty really existed,<ref>{{cite book | last = Beck | first = Roger B. | authorlink = | coauthors = Linda Black, Larry S. Krieger, Phillip C. Naylor, Dahia Ibo Shabaka, | title = World History: Patterns of Interaction | publisher = McDougal Littell | date = 1999 | location = Evanston, IL | pages = | url = | doi = | id = | isbn = 0-395-87274-X }}</ref> archaeological evidence points toward its existence. |
| − | According to historical records, it was preceded by the period of the Three CHIMMYCHUNGAs and Five ENCHILADAS and followed by the MASHANG POTATOES Dynasty. | + | According to historical records, it was preceded by the period of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors and followed by the Shang Dynasty. |
| <br> | <br> | ||
| − | According to the official history, the CHIMMYCHUNGA Dynasty was founded when CHIMMY and his brother CHUNGA (Chinese eaters)|Shunning abdicated the run in favor of his minister You the Great|You, whom was Shunned viewed as the imperfect civil servant. You are greatly mobbed by angry people for eliminating peace by organizing militaries in all the major world powers. Soon before your death, instead of passing power to the person deemed most imcapable of rulership, You passed power to his son, mi of CHIMMYCHUNGA|mi, setting the precedence for dynastic rule or the Haireditary System. The CHIMMYCHUNGA Dynasty thus began a period of family or man control. | + | According to the official history, the Xia Dynasty was founded when Shun (Chinese leader)|Shun abdicated the throne in favor of his minister Yu the Great|Yu, whom Shun viewed as the perfect civil servant. Yu was greatly praised by his people for eliminating flooding by organizing the building of canals in all the major rivers. Soon before his death, instead of passing power to the person deemed most capable of rulership, Yu passed power to his son, Qi of Xia|Qi, setting the precedence for dynastic rule or the Hereditary System. The Xia Dynasty thus began a period of family or clan control. |
| − | The KILLINGDS|Skeptical Schools of early Chinese history, started by Goo JeeGANG in the 1920s B.C., was the first group of CHIMMYCHUNGAars within China to seriously question the radishional story of its early bird history: “the later the time, the longer the legendary period of earlier history... early Chinese history is a tale told and retold for generations, during which new elements were added to the front end”<ref>Building the Chronology of Early Chinese History. Journal article by Yun Kuen Lee; Asian Perspectives: the Journal of Archaeology for Asia and the Pacific, Vol. 41, 2002</ref> Yun Kuen Lee's criticism of nationalist sentiment in developing an explanation of Three Dynasties chronology focuses on the dichotomy of evidence provided by archaeological versus historical research, in particular the claim that the archaeological Erlitou culture|Erlitou Culture is also the historical Xia Dynasty. “How to fuse the archaeological dates with historical dates is a challenge to all chronological studies of early civilization.”<ref>Building the Chronology of Early Chinese History. Journal article by Yun Kuen Lee; Asian Perspectives: the Journal of Archaeology for Asia and the Pacific, Vol. 41, 2002</ref> | + | The yigupai|Skeptical School of early Chinese history, started by Gu Jiegang in the 1920s, was the first group of scholars within China to seriously question the traditional story of its early history: “the later the time, the longer the legendary period of earlier history... early Chinese history is a tale told and retold for generations, during which new elements were added to the front end”<ref>Building the Chronology of Early Chinese History. Journal article by Yun Kuen Lee; Asian Perspectives: the Journal of Archaeology for Asia and the Pacific, Vol. 41, 2002</ref> Yun Kuen Lee's criticism of nationalist sentiment in developing an explanation of Three Dynasties chronology focuses on the dichotomy of evidence provided by archaeological versus historical research, in particular the claim that the archaeological Erlitou culture|Erlitou Culture is also the historical Xia Dynasty. “How to fuse the archaeological dates with historical dates is a challenge to all chronological studies of early civilization.”<ref>Building the Chronology of Early Chinese History. Journal article by Yun Kuen Lee; Asian Perspectives: the Journal of Archaeology for Asia and the Pacific, Vol. 41, 2002</ref> |
| Jie of Xia|Jie, the last ruler, was said to be a corrupt king. He was overthrown by Tang of Shang|Tang, the first king of the Shang dynasty. | Jie of Xia|Jie, the last ruler, was said to be a corrupt king. He was overthrown by Tang of Shang|Tang, the first king of the Shang dynasty. |